Report: Cuts to global family-planning aid could mean more unwanted pregnancies, deaths
Should the U.S. House GOP proposal to cut family-planning funding, as laid out in the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, or HR 1, pass,
Jul 31, 202019.4K Shares2.4M Views
Should the U.S. House GOP proposal to cut family-planning funding, as laid out in the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, or HR 1, pass, international recipients of family-planning aid will likely see high increases in maternal deaths, unintended pregnancies and abortion, according to a Guttmacher Institute reportreleased this week.
A provision in HR 1 — which the Senate initially rejected — appropriates not more than $440 million for family-planning/reproductive health services overseas and states that none of those funds can be made to any foreign non-governmental organization that promotes or performs abortion, except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother’s life is threatened. This would translate to about $200 million in cuts to family-planning assistance overseas; currently, $648.5 million is appropriated for foreign family-planning assistance, according to theKaiser Family Foundation. The money is administered by the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The Guttmacher Institute says that funding amount makes it possible for:
- 39 million women and couples to receive contraceptive services and supplies,
- 12 million unintended pregnancies and 5 million unplanned births to be averted,
- 5 million induced abortions to be averted (4 million of them unsafe),
- 33,000 maternal deaths to be averted,
- 4 million fewer healthy years of life to be lost among women, and
- 150,000 fewer children to lose their mothers.
Slicing that funding by $200 million, as proposed in the House-approved, HR 1would, according to Guttmacher, mean that:
- 12 million fewer women and couples would receive contraceptive services and supplies,
- 3.8 million more unintended pregnancies and 1.6 million more unplanned births would occur,
- 1.6 million more abortions would take place (of which 1.2 million would be unsafe),
- 10,000 more maternal deaths would occur,
- 1.2 million more years of healthy life would be lost, and
- 46,000 more children would lose their mothers. The American Independent previously flagged these potential cuts, which would basically reinstate the global gag rule, a now-defunct policy denying foreign aid money to any organizations involved in abortion.
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles