McCain v. Obama on Energy
Jul 31, 2020232.6K Shares4M Views
As Friends of the Earthand Gristhave pointed out, The Wall Street Journal’s comparisonof the presidential candidates’ energy policies reaches an incomplete conclusion. The WSJ’s Stephen Power argues that Sen. Obama supports a big government role while Sen. McCain supports a more hands-off approach. But that’s not really the case when it comes to McCain and nuclear energy.
In his 2007 climate bill, for example, McCain added$3.7 billion dollars in subsidies for new nuclear plants. Power does acknowledge McCain’s repeated calls for "incentives" for nuclear power, but leaves it at that. The Arizona senator has repeatedly said the federal government must support new technology development and research and development for the nuclear industry. Although he’s been vagueabout what "support" means exactly, he has explicitly called for loan guarantees and indirect subsidies. (Yale’s new online mag e360 sums up both McCain’s and Obama’s energy stances in a concise little post.)
As politicians and industry folks continueto flirt with the concept of a "nuclear renaissance," each candidate’s nuke plan becomes more and more relevant.
Paolo Reyna
Reviewer
Paolo Reyna is a writer and storyteller with a wide range of interests. He graduated from New York University with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies.
Paolo enjoys writing about celebrity culture, gaming, visual arts, and events. He has a keen eye for trends in popular culture and an enthusiasm for exploring new ideas. Paolo's writing aims to inform and entertain while providing fresh perspectives on the topics that interest him most.
In his free time, he loves to travel, watch films, read books, and socialize with friends.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles