Latest In

News

Green groups and GOP hopefuls oppose corn-based ethanol subsidies

Much of the attention on corn-based ethanol has focused on the role that this supposedly renewable fuel is playing in driving up global food prices.

Jul 31, 2020
7.3K Shares
526.3K Views
Image has not been found. URL: http://images.americanindependent.com/2010/08/MahurinEnviro_Thumb5.jpgMuch of the attention on corn-based ethanol has focused on the role that this supposedly renewable fuel is playing in driving up global food prices. Now environmental groups and some conservative politicians are pointing out another problem — corn-based ethanol consumes the bulk of federal funding on renewable energy and the big oil companies that blend the ethanol into gasoline are collecting subsidies to the tune of about $6 billion a year.
The Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit(or VEETC) is a 45 cents per gallon credit that goes to the refiner that blends the ethanol into fuel.
Because the government already mandates that ethanol be added to gasoline and bans the import of foreign ethanol, critics say that the VEETC is unnecessary to maintain supply and is now only a handout to the oil industry.
British Petroleum has not been open about the benefits it receives from the credit, but is widely believed to be the largest recipient of the credit.
The National Journalreported last year:
On BP’s website, the firm states: “As one of the largest blenders and marketers of biofuels in the nation, we blended over 1 billion gallons of ethanol with gasoline in 2008 alone.” Extrapolating from Energy Information Administration data on 2009 refining capacity, BP is estimated to have produced about 11.5 billion gallons of gasoline. If the company blended up to the 10 percent limit under current law, about 1.15 billion gallons would have been blended, translating to a $518 million tax benefit.
This credit wasn’t among those that the Senate considered scrapping weeks ago, but there does appear to be some political will to cut it.
Though presidential candidates are known to pander to the interest of farmers in Iowa, which holds the first conventions, campaigning in Iowa last month former Minnesota governor and Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty said that ethanol credits need to be rolled back.
“We need to do it gradually. We need to do it fairly. But we need to do it,” Pawlenty said. “The hard truth is that there are no longer any sacred programs.”
Candidate Newt Gingrich — who has received hundreds of thousands of dollars as a consultant for the ethanol group Growth Energy— is among the few Republicans campaigning who have not endorsed cuts to the VEETC, according to Sheila Karpf, legislative and policy analyst for the Environmental Working Group, which has been tracking the issue.
Karpf said that the credit was intended to make gas with ethanol more affordable but oil and gas companies are allow to collect the subsidy no matter how much profit they make.
Government credits for ethanol blenders are also problematic, she said, because they drain off resources that could support better renewable energy options.
“Corn ethanol actually increases greenhouse gases in the near term,” she said. This is because ethanol is mostly made in facilities that burn coal and natural gas.
Corn ethanol was supposed to be a bridge fuel that would lead to advanced bio-fuels from algae, switch grass or other sources, she said, but the multiple federal incentives aimed at corn have stifled development of this potentially superior alternatives.
“The fact that we are still paying VEETC is crazy,“ she said, “a really bad waste of taxpayer money.”
Legislation to end the VEETC has bi-partisan support in Congress.
In March Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Ben Cardin (D-MD) introduced a billto repeal the VEETC.
“While there are a wide range of federal incentives available for ethanol production, the VEETC essentially provides free money for blenders who are already mandated by the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) to blend ethanol in fuel,” they said in a statement as they introduced the bill.
“Moreover, while born of good intentions, federal subsidies for ethanol have had less than satisfactory results. Ethanol-blended fuel is nearly a third less efficient than gasoline (ethanol burns at 68 percent the energy content of gasoline), has contributed to the increased price of corn (as well as land, feed, and other input costs), and can cause engine damage in motor vehicles.”
A March Government Accountability Office reportrecommended that Congress reconsider the VEETC and stated that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Treasury Dept. could save the federal government $5.7 billion by addressing duplicative efforts aimed at increasing domestic ethanol production.
Camilo Wood

Camilo Wood

Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing. Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers. Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles