Latest In

News

Illinois judge supports eavesdropping law allowing prosecutions for taping police

Correction: This article has been amended to reflect that Posner indicated support for the eavesdropping law. He did not rule against it, given the circuit

Jul 31, 2020
472 Shares
472.1K Views
Correction: This article has been amended to reflect that Posner indicated support for the eavesdropping law. He did not rule against it, given the circuit court consists of a three-judge panel. We regret the error.
This week, U.S. 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner came out in supportof an Illinois eavesdropping law prohibiting the taping of policy activity, saying if the law was weakened, “snooping” bloggers and gang members would “rejoice” at the news.
The case is before the court given a challenge filedby the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU of Illinois has vowed to seek a federal injunctionthat would stop future prosecutions under the law in Cook County.
The case comes from Chicago, where police officers tried to dissuadeTiawanda Moore from filing a sexual assault complaint against one of their ilk, she tried to turn the tables on them — Moore took out a Blackberry and recorded their resistance to allow her to press charges.
Before she knew it, Moore had been slapped with an eavesdropping charge that’s becoming increasingly common as local police crack down on anyone who attempts to monitor police activity. She faced a class 1 felony prosecution and up to 15 years in prison.
Moore was acquitted, but therecent spate of prosecutions under this eavesdropping law have made civil liberties advocates fear Moore’s eventual fate could be uncommon.
“In order to make the rights of free expression and petition effective, individuals and organizations must be able to freely gather and record information about the conduct of government and its agents– especially the police,” said Harvey Grossman, legal director of the ACLU of Illinois. “Organizations and individuals should not be threatened with prosecution and jail time simply for monitoring the activities of police in public, having conversations in a public place at normal volume of conversation.”
Illinois is one of only a small handful of states that has criminalized civilians who record the police, including Massachusetts and Maryland. The U.S. Court of Appeals recently ruled that prosecuting individuals for recording on-duty policy officers violates the First Amendment. A judge at Boston’s First Circuit Court of Appeals made a similar ruling.
Camilo Wood

Camilo Wood

Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing. Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers. Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles