The New Hampshire state representative sponsoring a bill that would repeal the state’s same-sex marriage law has decided not to pursue a constitutional
“„Bates said he did not want to risk having lawmakers choosing between two measures: the bill and a constitutional amendment.
“„“It would complicate the decision for legislators if there was another alternative out there,” he said.
“„The legislative process seems the appropriate way to decide the issue, he said. If a constitutional amendment is used, millions of dollars in out-of-state money would flow into New Hampshire on both sides of the issue, he said.
“„“I don’t think that’s the way people want it decided,” he said.
“„“I applaud those legislators in New Hampshire who are working to defend marriage as an institution between one man and one woman,” Perry said, adding that he supported the “sanctity of traditional marriage.”