Assessing the Bradley Effect « The Washington Independent
Jul 31, 2020710.8K Shares10M Views
Throughout this election cycle, many Democrats have assumed that Sen. Barack Obama must take a lead of more than one or two percentage points in the polls into Election Day because his actual numbers will get knocked down a notch by the so-called Bradley Effect— the idea that some voters disingenuously tell pollsters that they plan to vote for a black candidate for fear of appearing racist if they responded otherwise.
Yet as Sherry Bebitch Jeffe points out in a detailed historical analysis, the 1982 electoral loss of black candidate Tom Bradley gives little evidence for the effect that took his name. Instead, Bradley’s loss can be explained by a combination of guns and absentee ballots.
But Jeffe lays it out more articulately than I could, so be sure to take a look at her piece.
The best analysis I’ve seen of the potential Bradley Effect in the 2008 presidential election comes from Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com. Looking at the Democratic primary, he argues that there was no such effect, although unlike Jeffe he believes that the phenomenon played a large role in elections in the 1980s and 1990s.
Paolo Reyna
Reviewer
Paolo Reyna is a writer and storyteller with a wide range of interests. He graduated from New York University with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies.
Paolo enjoys writing about celebrity culture, gaming, visual arts, and events. He has a keen eye for trends in popular culture and an enthusiasm for exploring new ideas. Paolo's writing aims to inform and entertain while providing fresh perspectives on the topics that interest him most.
In his free time, he loves to travel, watch films, read books, and socialize with friends.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles