(Sort of) In Defense of the Clemens Hearing
Jul 31, 2020913.8K Shares12.3M Views
Illustration by: Matt Mahurin
Congress is on vacation this week, providing an opportunity for members of the House oversight committee to catch up on the terrible press they got for the “Did Roger Clemens take steroids?” hearing last week.
Pundits across the nationhave harumphed that committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) was on an ego trip and the committee has more pressing matters. Waxman, of course, helped facilitate the pile-on by telling the New York Timesthat the hearing took place only because Clemens’ lawyers insisted upon it.
That there are more deserving probes than whether Clemens took steroids is a legit argument, though it’s doubtful these critics will weigh in on the committee’s next FDA or government contract hearing.
Less valid, though, are the contemptuous sneers emanating from the nation’s sportswriters. In “A Pathetic Display on Capitol Hill“, for instance, John Feinstein writes:
“You see Congress should never get involved in sports. When it does, it is nothing more than a pathetic play to get publicity. Most of the time, the congressmen involved don’t know what they’re talking about. They mis-pronounce names, get facts wrong (or maybe they just ‘mis-remember,’ facts) and generally act star-struck whenever a professional athlete wanders into their midst.”
Yet Feinstein also writes:
“Baseball has now managed to reach a point where it is very possible that 10 years from now the all-time hits leader; the all-time home-run hitter; the first man to hit 70 home runs in a season and the man many consider the best pitcher of the last 50 years will not be in the Hall of Fame.”
He also calls this “pathetic” but says “almost no one in Congress knows enough about the complicated multi-billion dollar industries of sports.” Given members of the committee familiarity with the defense contracting and pharmaceutical industries I suspect they’re not naive about the sordid world of ESPN TV money.
Indeed, a March 2005 committee hearingmade clear that it’s baseballand Commissioner Bud Selig who are impotent at dealing with baseball’s steroid culture. That hearing prompted a mea culpa from Selig and the commissioning of the Mitchell Report, the first comprehensive documentation of baseball’s relationship with performance enhancing drugs.
The hearing last week was embarrassing. But in the larger scheme of things, Feinstein should be appreciative of the impressive transparency Congress has provided about steroids in baseball. He could be writing about Iraq war profiteering.
Paolo Reyna
Reviewer
Paolo Reyna is a writer and storyteller with a wide range of interests. He graduated from New York University with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies.
Paolo enjoys writing about celebrity culture, gaming, visual arts, and events. He has a keen eye for trends in popular culture and an enthusiasm for exploring new ideas. Paolo's writing aims to inform and entertain while providing fresh perspectives on the topics that interest him most.
In his free time, he loves to travel, watch films, read books, and socialize with friends.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles