Federal Civilian Courts for GTMO Detainees?
Just got off a conference call with Caroline Fredrickson, the director of the ACLU’s Washington office. Fredrickson and a number of civil-libertarian and
Jul 31, 20205.5K Shares616.8K Views
Just got off a conference call with Caroline Fredrickson, the director of the ACLU’s Washington office. Fredrickson and a number of civil-libertarian and national-security colleagues met yesterday with members of the Obama transition’s Justice and Pentagon agency review teams to discuss the modalities of closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. And she came away from the 90-minute meeting thinking that the transition reacted positively to the coalition’s arguments for trying Guantanamo detainees in civilian courts.
“They did not want to talk about national security courts,” Fredrickson said, referring to a proposal to create special courts for terrorism cases with lax standards of evidence and process compared to regular civilian courts, considering it “a good sign.” Instead, she said, the transition staffers asked questions about the difference between the military’s court martial system and traditional process. “They wanted to know more about [the Uniform Code of Military Justice] and why that might not be as good as criminal courts,” Fredrickson said.
The coalition emphasized that a system of preventative detention would still be a massive human-rights and civil-liberties mess; and pushed back on the idea that the abuse suffered by detainees at Guantanamo would get the terrorism cases summarily thrown out in civilian court. “We can’t imagine anyone who really fits that category,” Fredrickson said, dismissing as too hypothetical a case of “someone who’s dangerous but there’s no admissible evidence” against him. “The bottom line is our criminal laws are very broad,” she said.
Fredrickson qualified her impressions of the meeting by saying the agency review team members she spoke with wore their “poker faces” and weren’t going to be the ones carrying out policy in the administration. Nor was she told of any timeline that President-elect Obama will enact to close Guantanamo Bay once in office. But “the meeting was about closing Guatnanamo,” she said, a bit bewildered to seriously discuss such a thing with emissaries of the next president of the United States. “Even that says… we’re in a different world now, aren’t we?”
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles