“„The Guardian has spoken to three people with knowledge of the discussions in the Obama camp. There is no talk of Obama approving direct diplomatic negotiations with Hamas early on, but he is being urged by advisers to initiate low-level or clandestine approaches, and there is growing recognition in Washington that the policy of ostracising Hamas is counter-productive. A tested course would be to start contacts through Hamas and the US intelligence services, similar to the secret process through which the US engaged with the PLO in the 1970s. Israel did not become aware of the contacts until much later.
A couple things here, first on process and then on substance.
I have no direct knowledge, but seeing the on-the-record quotes in the piece — Steve Clemons, etc — it wouldn’t surprise me if this was a case of reporter Suzanne Goldenberg hearing a few rumors and then calling people who’ve heard the rumors too and then printing them. This happens. We’re all under pressure to break news. Lots of people in Washington hear lots of things. Sometimes transition people hear things from journalists and then the transition people talk with other transition people and then the journalist calls thattransition person and all of a sudden what started as a journalist speculation now becomes an inside information. This business can really, really, reallyblow if you’re not careful. I’m not saying I know for a fact that’s what’s happening in this case. It just wouldn’t surprise me is all. However, one of the reasons you have intelligence services is to initiate contacts with officially-untouchable groups like Hamas. This is something that you won’t hear CIA Director-designate Leon Panetta or Director of National Intelligence-nominee Dennis Blair talk about in their confirmation hearings — to do otherwise would undermine the point — but it’s a fact of life. Does it really benefit the United States to not have anycontact with an organization, however loathsome I might find it, that holds power over half of the Palestinian territories? And if the Palestinians end up going more and more into Hamas’s camp, does that mean that millions of Palestinians face diplomatic isolation? That’s an untenable position. Hamas outreach through the CIA is a pretty sensible way for the United States to hedge its bets. (Think it hasn’t alreadyhappened? I don’t have any inside information, but to believe otherwise is naive.)