Levin Thinks the Post-2010 Training Mission in Iraq is Too Big
From the office of Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee: “President Obama’s plan establishes a reasonable
Jul 31, 20201M Shares15.5M Views
From the office of Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee:
The question, I suppose, is whether antiwar figures think 16 months — from August 2010 to December 2011, when the Status of Forces Agreement turns the occupation of Iraq into a pumpkin — is too long to keep a force of that size for training/advisory/”limited counterterrorism” missions in Iraq.
Presumably, the force wouldn’t even stay at that size for 16 months, since a force sized at several divisions is unlikely to pack all its equipment up and go home in a single day. Three more years in Iraq is indeed a hedged bet, but think about it this way: As a candidate, Obama used to talk about a “residual force” past his old 16-month combat-troop withdrawal plan. The Status of Forces Agreement places a hard deadline on that comparatively open-ended proposal. It’s odd to be surprised by this after Obama spent two years talking about leaving 30,000 troops in Iraq indefinitely.
Paolo Reyna
Reviewer
Paolo Reyna is a writer and storyteller with a wide range of interests. He graduated from New York University with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies.
Paolo enjoys writing about celebrity culture, gaming, visual arts, and events. He has a keen eye for trends in popular culture and an enthusiasm for exploring new ideas. Paolo's writing aims to inform and entertain while providing fresh perspectives on the topics that interest him most.
In his free time, he loves to travel, watch films, read books, and socialize with friends.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles