Torture Distinctions With Differences
Greg Sargent makes a great point about the torture memos: What was actually revealed in yesterday’s memos was the nature of the Bush administration’s
Jul 31, 20206.3K Shares2.1M Views
“„What was actually revealed in yesterday’s memos was the nature of the Bush administration’s efforts to legalize and justify the “harsh interrogation techniques” that we mostly knew about already. And it’s not terribly difficult to imagine why some folks would want those legal efforts kept under wraps.
That’s apropos of the chorus of Bush officials — see this Politico piece, for instance; or this Michael Mukasey/Mike Hayden op-ed— who are saying that Obama irresponsibly revealed CIA torture techniques. He revealed them, in all likelihood, because he’s forsworn them, and to move on. As Greg says, we knewmost of this stuff had happened. (Obama noted the same thing yesterday.) What really rankles these people is that their ability to harmonize putting someone in a “confinement box” with insects with statutes and treaties that expressly forbid torture is now entirely on display.
Let’s put it another way. One thing that the August 1, 2002 Yoo/Bybee torture memo— the one released in 2004 — focuses on is the alleged difficulty of defining what interrogation procedures would “shock the conscience” of a reasonable individual, since that standard is rather salient when it comes to the federal anti-torture statute. By taking a deliberately agnostic stance on the prospect of ever finding such a consensus around “reasonableness” — hey, it’s a wide world out there, what shocks me might not shock you, so who’s to say— you wind up with absurdities like rubber-stamping as humane our confinement box of insects. As it happens, when a conservative friend of mine read that the Justice Department had blessed putting people in a confinement box of insects, he IM’d me to say “Holy ****.” Miracle of miracles: putting someone in a confinement box of insects makes people say Holy ****. We have our reasonable-individual standard reaction.
Indeed, the only person who doesn’t mind putting someone in an enclosed space with insects is [Buffalo Bill from “The Silence of the Lambs.”](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Bill_(The_Silence_of_the_Lambs)) The memos reveal that for a long time, the government of the United States adopted his moral standards. If you had been guided by that legal reasoning, you’d do whatever was in your power to keep it from the public, since you know what they’ll say.
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles