Latest In

Breaking News

Grassley, Public Health Plans and the Slippery Slope to a Single-Payer System

Yesterday we mentioned that Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the senior Republican on the Finance Committee and a fierce opponent of public health plans, had left

Jul 31, 2020
61.4K Shares
4.7M Views
Yesterday we mentionedthat Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the senior Republican on the Finance Committee and a fierce opponent of public health plans, had left the door open to including a public option in the sweeping health care reforms he’s currently drafting with panel Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.).
Today Grassley all but eliminated the possibility that he would support such a plan, warning that it would be the first step toward a health care system controlled entirely by the government.
From a speech today on the Senate floor:
[S]ome say that we can avoid these [payment] problems by putting the government-run plan on a level playing field with private insurers. They say Congress could setup a system so that the government-run health insurance plan has to follow the same rules as private insurers. They say it would have to pay the same rates, form networks and be independently solvent. So my question is this – when this new government-run health insurance plans starts to cost too much, is Congress going to start breaking its promises? Will it change the rules? [...]
[M]aybe at first Congress repeals the requirement that the government-run plan has to form a network. Next, Congress might allow the government plan to start paying lower rates than private insurers – just like Medicare and Medicaid. At that point, Congress might let the government-run plan dip into the treasury from time to time to keep the government plan solvent. This would increase government costs for everyone.
As the government takes more and more control over the plan, providers would get paid less and taxpayers would end up paying more. Rates for the government-run health insurance plan would be lower than private insurers because the government can impose lower rates by law – also known as price-fixing. This is a common talking point for supporters of the government run plan. They say the government can use its influence to lower costs. But as the government cuts payments to providers, costs will go up for everyone in the private market.
Slowly but surely the government plan would take over the market. Eventually, all the promises about creating a level playing field have been broken, and we would be left with a single-payer, government-run health insurance program. The simple truth is supporters of a government plan absolutely intend for this to be the outcome.
The question is, can Grassley convince Baucus of the same thing?
Camilo Wood

Camilo Wood

Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing. Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers. Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles