McChrystal’s Full Letter to Levin on Detainees
Earlier this morning I referred to a written statement given to Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) from Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal
Jul 31, 2020289.2K Shares3.8M Views
Earlier this morning I referred to a written statementgiven to Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) from Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal clarifying his position on detainees after he initially wrote in answer to pre-hearing questions that he believed in treating detainees according to the “principles of international law and Common Article 3″ of the Geneva Conventions “to the extent appropriate and consistent with military necessity.” That raised the eyebrows of some committee members — it’s reminiscent of the language used by President George W. Bush in 2001 to get around the Geneva Conventions for terrorism detainees — and so McChrystal wrote to then yesterday for the record.
Here’s the substance of McChrystal’s clarification. The letter isn’t yet up on the committee’s website, and I’ll update with a link when it is. [Update: Voila. PDF.]
“„We must at all times adhere to our obligation to treat detainees humanely. Military necessity, along with humanity, are principles underlying the law of war. Military necessity does not permit us to derogate from these imperatives. However, the principle of military necessity recognizes that under certain battlefield conditions it is infeasible to render certain benefits to detained individuals. For example, at the point of capture while still engaged in an uncertain situation it may be impossible for a temporary period to make provisions for the exercise of religious beliefs by detained persons. Once a detainee is processed into a controlled detention facility; such provisions are made readily available to detained persons.
The full text of the letter is after the jump.
“„Dear Mr. Chairman,
It was brought to my attention that the committee expressed concerns related to my language “…to the extent appropriate and consistent with military necessity …” in response to an advanced policy question on treatment of detainees.
Let me be clear–It is my duty to ensure that all detainees are held in conformity with all applicable laws governing the conditions of confinement, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. We must at all times adhere to our obligation to treat detainees humanely. Military necessity, along with humanity, are principles underlying the law of war. Military necessity does not permit us to derogate from these imperatives. However, the principle of military necessity recognizes that under certain battlefield conditions it is
infeasible to render certain benefits to detained individuals. For example, at the point of capture while still engaged in an uncertain situation it may be impossible for a temporary period to make provisions for the exercise of religious beliefs by detained persons. Once a detainee is processed into a controlled detention facility; such provisions are made readily available to detained persons.
Finally, I will ensure our Soldiers continue to provide custody with dignity and respect for every detainee with a dedication to modeling and maintaining world class standards.
Very respectfully,
STANLEY MCCHRYSTAL
“„Lieutenant General, USA
Director, Joint Staff
Rhyley Carney
Reviewer
Latest Articles
Popular Articles