UPDATE: Republican National Lawyers Association Falls for Debunked ACORN Story
UPDATE: After I wrote this post, Michael Thielen e-mailed this comment: It is clear that the founder of ACORN is so embarrassed by the taint associated with
Jul 31, 202014.9K Shares2.9M Views
UPDATE: After I wrote this post, Michael Thielen e-mailed this comment:
It’s been hours since the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now informed methat Kevin Mooney’s storyin the Washington Examiner, about a pending “name change” for the group, was wrong. And yet I just got this release (via Danny Diaz, a consultant who is working with anti-Employee Free Choice Act groups) from the Republican National Lawyers Assocation in which Michael Thielen falls for the story hook, line, and sinker.
“„The notion that the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – also known as ACORN – could simply change its name and wipe away the taint from the fraud it has perpetuated against our electoral system and the American people is laughable. ACORN can call itself whatever it wants, but it is still an enterprise that is being investigated by law enforcement officials and prosecuted in the court system…
And etc.
But the story isn’t true!
Mooney misinterpreted the actions of Wade Rathke, the founder of ACORN, who runs a separate group now, and he spoke to several ex-ACORN employees who have been campaigning against the organization. Here’s what ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis told me:
“„ACORN is not changing its name. ACORN International is a five-year old organization from which ACORN withdrew a year ago as part of an overall restructuring process and requested that they stop using the ACORN name, which they have now done. Wade Rathke was fired as Chief Organizer of ACORN in June 2008.
Mooney actually gets in this in his story — yes, the one about ACORN changing its name.
“„Arthur Schwartz, the general counsel for ACORN, has sent a “cease and desist” letter to [anti-ACORN group ACORN 8] instructing them to discontinue using the name ACORN in a connection with their activities. This same letter threatens legal action if the ACORN 8 members do not provide written assurances that they will comply with this demand by the end of June. “It is a violation of federal and state law for you to use the ACORN name and mark without the written permission of ACORN,” the letter states. “Should you continue to do so, you will be liable for monetary and injunctive relief.”
Why would ACORN send this letter if it was scrapping its name?
–
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles