Russia, China, Iran: Ponies for Everyone
Foreign Policy replies to my skepticism at the idea of Russia and China backing an oil-embargo package on the Iranian regime with this recent piece by
Jul 31, 20201.9K Shares965K Views
Foreign Policy repliesto my skepticismat the idea of Russia and China backing an oil-embargo package on the Iranian regime with this recent pieceby Brookings’ Erica Downs on China’s looming oil-sector investments in Iran. Downs gives some reason for thinking that the United States has leverage with the Chinese:
“„Beijing recognizes that a nuclear-armed Iran would almost certainly be detrimental to its energy security. Iran’s development of a nuclear weapons capability — and the regional nuclear arms race this might trigger — would foster instability in the Persian Gulf, jeopardizing the free flow of oil into the market. It could also strain China’s relationship with Saudi Arabia, which has been China’s top crude oil supplier for most of this decade and opposes Iran’s going nuclear. And despite appearances, China does not want to jeopardize its relationship with the United States. Not only does Beijing value its relations with Washington more than its ties to Tehran, but it relies on the U.S. Navy to protect the sea lanes between the Persian Gulf and China.
These are good reasons to believe that the Chinese would back an international effort to ensure the Iranian nuclear program doesn’t have a military dimension. They already do. But this alone doesn’t get you Chinese endorsement or acquiescence of punitive measures. If I understand FP’s pointcorrectly, the Saudis would have to threaten to cut off Chinese oil imports to ensure China’s complicity in an oil-sanctions regime. But would they? Not only have the Saudis not stated support for such an embargo, the Saudis didn’t even support an oil embargo over the Gaza war. We’re a couple of billiard-shots away from this policy coming together. Maybeit could, but it doesn’t seem likely. We’re far from getting Russian support, on top of all this.
“„In fact, here’s a good time-saver: if you read any story about a gasoline embargo [of] Iran, just scan quickly and get to the part where the reporter explains how and why Russia and China would go along. If it’s not mentioned, the story is inconsequential.
As Dan says, quoting the ever-talented Belle Waring, this is shaping up to be quite the pony-wishing exercise.
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles