The Treasury Department’s report on the progress -- or lack of it -- among servicers doing loan modifications makes it seem like the Obama administration is
“„Consider this graph:
“„Yay! It’s up and to the right! Things must be great, no? Except there’s that annoying word “cumulative”. Cumulative graphs are generally misleading: they can only ever go up, and can’t ever go down. In order to judge this graph, you really have to look very closely at the gradient, to see whether the rate of modification trials is increasing at all. And it seems that it isn’t.
“„What’s more, you’ll look in vain, in this report, for any indication of how the rate of new modifications compares to the rate of new foreclosures. That’s the key thing to look at: if the rate of foreclosures starts to fall, we might be getting somewhere. But that rate isn’t mentioned in the report.
“„Yes, the report does single out some servicers, such as Wachovia Mortgage, for their very low modification rates. But overall it seems to be determined to paint a rosy picture of the HMA scheme, rather than objectively reporting on whether it’s working or not.
“„The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), in response to the Treasury announcement, calls for a full stop to foreclosure on any HAMP-eligible property, whether the borrower is committed or not. Additionally, ACORN wants servicers to explore alternative methods of aiding ailing borrowers, for example by principal forgiveness as opposed to forbearance. Furthermore, servicers are unevenly applying the program, they say, with little adherence to regulatory hurdles, such as in the inappropriate levying of modification fees onto the borrower.
“„“There is a great incentive [for servicers] to take part,” says Brenda Muniz, legislative director at ACORN National. “Yet there are no consequences if [HAMP] is violated.”