VoteVets Blasts Obama on Dwell Time
The progressive Iraq/Afghanistan veterans group VoteVets has been, to the best of my knowledge, supportive of a properly resourced and focused Afghanistan
Jul 31, 20204.2K Shares2.1M Views
The progressive Iraq/Afghanistan veterans group VoteVets has been, to the best of my knowledge, supportive of a properly resourced and focused Afghanistan strategy for quite some time. But it surprised a lot of people when it announced that it couldn’t support the Obama administration’s “extended surge” on Tuesday. That’s because the group sees the policy as effectively foreclosing on another stated administration priority: increasing the time between deployments of soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines,known as “dwell time.”
I’ve been curious about the actual fate of the Pentagon plan announced earlier this year to increase active-duty soldiers’ dwell time to two years per yearlong deployment by 2011 ever since I crunched the available troop numbers last month. I don’t quite see how an “extended surge” can last “18 to 24 months” and possibly longer while increasingdwell time. But I haven’t been able to get a clear answer from the Pentagon on whether the plan is actually shelved. In testimony yesterday, Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, indicated that it is.
In a new post, VoteVets’ Richard Smith (who — full disclosure — is a friend of mine) describes being told straight-up by a senior administration official that the dwell time increase would proceed:
“„[D]irectly after the President’s speech, I personally spoke with a senior White House official who informed me that all of the service chiefs had reviewed this strategy and that no adverse effects on dwell time were anticipated.
Jon Soltz, the organization’s chairman, questions whether the extended surge will actually roll back troops’ existingdwell time:
“„This is just one of the troubling consequences of the Obama strategy for Afghanistan. Can we really guarantee Dwell Time for troops at least equal to the length of their deployments? What about ending Stop Loss, or not using the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), or mobilizations that are no longer than 12 months for the National Guard and Reserve? All of those could be in jeopardy. These concerns are why VoteVets.org can’t endorse this strategy. The math doesn’t add up, and Admiral Mullen’s testimony raises more concerns and questions than answers.
Camilo Wood
Reviewer
Camilo Wood has over two decades of experience as a writer and journalist, specializing in finance and economics. With a degree in Economics and a background in financial research and analysis, Camilo brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing.
Throughout his career, Camilo has contributed to numerous publications, covering a wide range of topics such as global economic trends, investment strategies, and market analysis. His articles are recognized for their insightful analysis and clear explanations, making complex financial concepts accessible to readers.
Camilo's experience includes working in roles related to financial reporting, analysis, and commentary, allowing him to provide readers with accurate and trustworthy information. His dedication to journalistic integrity and commitment to delivering high-quality content make him a trusted voice in the fields of finance and journalism.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles