The Political Case for Passing Health Care Reform
Since Scott Brown’s stunning Senate victory in Massachusetts last month, the thinking among a good number of moderate Democrats seems to be that simply having
Jul 31, 202072.8K Shares1.9M Views
Since Scott Brown’s stunning Senate victoryin Massachusetts last month, the thinking among a good number of moderate Democrats seems to be that simply having the House pass the Senate’s version of health care reform — complete with $100 millionin special Medicaid funding for Sen. Ben Nelson’s (D) Nebraska — would leave them vulnerable on the campaign trail this year, even if separately they pass amendments plucking out some of the pork. This fear is alive among House Democrats, who don’t want to be seen as a rubber stamp for the Senate’s bill, and also Senate moderates, who are worried about an outcry against reconciliation, the budget process that, if invoked, would allow upper-chamber Democrats to pass the amending bill with a simple majority.
Today, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne points outwhy notadopting and amending the Senate bill would be an even larger political liability in November.
“„The real problem is that some Senate Democratic moderates are petrified that Republicans will make terrible trouble if the amendments are passed through the “reconciliation process,” which is fancy congressional talk for majority rule. …
“„But if Democrats are that intimidated by Republicans, they should just give up their majority. And this fear is politicallyshortsighted. Right now, every Democrat in the Senate has to defend a vote for the health-care bill anyway, with nothing to show for it — and this includes defending the Nebraska deal.
“By contrast,” Dionne adds, “voting for amendments to the original Senate bill would be a sign that Democrats heard the message from Massachusetts.”
Not to mention, it would signal that the Democratic majority is actually capable of moving big-change bills, which was the reason that voters sent them to Washington to begin with.
Dexter Cooke
Reviewer
Dexter Cooke is an economist, marketing strategist, and orthopedic surgeon with over 20 years of experience crafting compelling narratives that resonate worldwide.
He holds a Journalism degree from Columbia University, an Economics background from Yale University, and a medical degree with a postdoctoral fellowship in orthopedic medicine from the Medical University of South Carolina.
Dexter’s insights into media, economics, and marketing shine through his prolific contributions to respected publications and advisory roles for influential organizations.
As an orthopedic surgeon specializing in minimally invasive knee replacement surgery and laparoscopic procedures, Dexter prioritizes patient care above all.
Outside his professional pursuits, Dexter enjoys collecting vintage watches, studying ancient civilizations, learning about astronomy, and participating in charity runs.
Latest Articles
Popular Articles