Remember that controversial rule in the financial regulatory reform law, designed to prevent banks from making risky bets on their own behalf? It did not take
“„One of the more aggressive new requirements, the so-called Volcker Rule, would limit proprietary trading to 3% of Tier 1 capital. But the rule may be easy to sidestep. Goldman Sachs is leading the way around the regulation, by simply reclassifying many of its prop traders as asset managers. One major initial criticismof the Volcker rule was that it’s hard to distinguish prop trading from market making. Goldman is using this blurry line to its advantage.
“„Prop Trading
“„A bank senses that XYZ corp is going to collapse. So its prop traders short the stock by selling stock option contracts to investors who want to bet long on XYZ’s continued success.
“„Asset Management
“„A bank senses that XYZ corp is going to collapse. So its asset managers short the stock by selling stock option contracts to their clients who want to bet long on XYZ’s continued success.
“„You may have noticed that, other than the two strikethroughs which merely changed terminology, those two descriptions were identical. The firm accomplishes precisely the same end. The Volcker rule, thus, boils down to semantics. It’s only prop trading if you fail to classify a trade as “client related.” And there it is — the first big loophole in the new financial regulation bill found and exploited. It barely took a week.
“„The score so far: Big Banks 1, Congress 0