The resignation highlighted a significant issue with OCPA: Its refusal to engage in honest disagreement with others and its reliance on smears and questionable tactics instead.
Below, we’ll dive into what led to Keating's resignation from OCPA, and how OCPA continues to engage in these same tactics today. We’ll also look at why people should care about what’s happening in this controversial, group.
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairsis a conservative think tank based in Oklahoma City. It was founded in 1993 by a small group of donors with the express intention of advancing their conservative agenda. Since then, OCPA has become a {voice for far-right conservatives} and beyond. However, it has also developed a reputation for using questionable tactics to push its agenda, including personal attacks on opponents and false claims about others' positions or beliefs.
In particular, Keating cited OCPA's refusal to engage with those who disagreed with them and their use of smears and false claims to discredit opponents.
Keating's departure was seen as a significant blow to OCPA, indicating that the organization's tactics were unacceptable. Since then, however, there has been little indication that OCPA is willing to change its approach.
In the years since Keating resigned from the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, it has become increasingly clear that the organization still engages in questionable tactics and smears instead of honest debate.
They continue to attack those who disagree with them or challenge their views; for instance, in 2018, they ran a series of misleading ads attacking State Question 805, which sought reforms to Oklahoma's criminal justice system. OCPA has also been accused of using false or misleading information to discredit opponents. For example, in 2019, they produced a report criticizing Medicaid expansionthat made numerous inaccurate claims and was widely denounced by medical professionals. The resignation of former Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating from OCPA sent a strong message: That the organization's tactics were unacceptable and needed to change.
Unfortunately, OCPA has chosen to continue down the same path, relying on smears and questionable tacticsinstead of engaging in honest debate. As a result, their influence in Oklahoma politics remains as controversial as ever. It's up to each individual to determine whether or not they're willing to support an organization like OCPA, given its approach. However, it's essential to be aware of their tactics and how they can potentially impact public discourse.
After all, honest debate and open dialogue are critical components of any healthy democracy – something that OCPAseems unwilling to accept. By staying informed and speaking out against these tactics, we can ensure that our voices are heard, and our democracy remains strong.